![]() Millions of pistols, rifles of the same type have been manufactured over the years if the one you have is exactly the same as one you can buy on the open market (and probably in better condition) then refurbishment comes into question. The same goes for firearms, if it has sentimental value rather than historic and the cost of refurbishment is not over the top go for it. More interest would be had if in a condition where it could be restored and is done than just saying it was dug up on the Somme or elsewhere in its original dug up state. Hand grenades are a typical example, there were millions of them produced both in WW 1 and WW 2. Too many people especially in war relics with no actual history as such tend to keep the object virtually as found. We see this in many guesses, if something has a history that can make it unique then leave it alone. Again, if it has parts that have been incorrectly replaced or altered, it may be best to restore it back to its original configuration. Historyĭoes it have specific, historical importance? If so, can you prove it with documentation? Probably best to leave it alone then. Is the firearm rare or unique? If so, is it in the correct configuration, or have pieces and parts been incorrectly replaced or altered over the years? If yes, then it’s best to restore it back to its original configuration. Ready to talk about your restoration project? Click here to start the conversation. That’s because helping our customers arrive at the decision that’s right for them is what’s most important to us.īelow are some of the questions we cover when discussing the pros and cons of firearm restoration. It may surprise you how much restoration work we decline. A big part of what we do is help our customers understand all the ins and outs of firearm restoration. H & D Folsom revived the Batavia Leader name but with steel barrels like the old Batavia Special.įrom your serial number your gun is an H&D Folsom produced Batavia Leader and should have steel barrels.To restore, or not to restore?That’s the foundational question to ask yourself when considering what could become a journey to revitalize, or perhaps even resurrect, your classic firearm. In 1919 Baker sold out their gun business to H&D Folsom. discontinued all these "Batavia" models and replaced them with the Black Beauty and the Black Beauty Special. There was also a Batavia Ejector that listed at $35 with steel barrels and $37.50 with Damascus barrels. ![]() From a 1909 copy of The Baker Gunner - The Batavia Leader had twist barrels and listed at $25 - The Batavia Special had steel barrels and listed at $21.75 - The Batavia Damascus had Damascus barrels and listed at $28 - and, finally the Batavia Brush had 26-inch twist barrels and a straight-grip stock listing at $24 and offered swivels and a sling as an option for $3. days there were several variations of the lower priced "Batavia" line. ![]() In the very last Baker ads that I've found in old sporting magazines from April and May 1928, and October 1929, Folsom also offered a 410-bore Batavia Leader, though I've never seen one.ĭuring the Baker Gun & Forging Co. Folsom-made Baker guns normally have an F before or after the serial number. Folsom added the 20-gauge to the Baker line that they produced. a major marketer, manufacturer and importer of low priced guns. After WW-I with the rise of repeaters Baker sold their gun business to H&D Folsom Co. To reduce costs the Batavia line did not have the "firing pin block safety" or the "draw block" which passes transversely through the barrel lug and mates into recesses in the frame, of the graded Baker hammerless guns and the Model 1897 hammer gun. The Batavia guns were the low priced or "field grade" models of the Baker Gun & Forging Co. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |